RockBitch
Member
MOTM June '19
linda86 ~MomLife~ ~BusyLife~ ~BabyBoy~
Join Date: Feb 28, 2019 19:14:05 GMT
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 1,341
Location: The Netherlands
Last Online: Mar 19, 2022 8:57:28 GMT
|
Post by RockBitch on Jan 8, 2021 21:10:18 GMT
That's really cool!! That makes me very excited.
|
|
melissavandella
Member
Pink Crust
Join Date: Oct 17, 2019 8:30:35 GMT
Posts: 505
Likes: 989
Last Online: Nov 17, 2024 9:45:26 GMT
|
Post by melissavandella on Jan 8, 2021 21:11:07 GMT
I think we can expect a video in two weeks the earliest. Next week he has a movie (a real film) coming out with MGK.
|
|
Jinkxx
Member
20 June 2008 & 04 May 2023 - The days I met Avril <3
Join Date: Mar 13, 2015 20:51:25 GMT
Posts: 6,154
Likes: 10,038
Location: The Netherlands
Last Online: Nov 11, 2024 12:50:54 GMT
|
Post by Jinkxx on Jan 8, 2021 21:13:46 GMT
So we got the MV confirmed I guess... Whoooop so cool! This morning I said itβs okay but not a masterpiece and still isnβt a masterpiece but I really really like it!! Gonna play this one a lot
|
|
BogoGog24
Administrator
I'm off again in my world...
Join Date: Mar 14, 2015 12:38:58 GMT
Posts: 15,225
Likes: 40,346
Last Online: Nov 17, 2024 3:53:03 GMT
|
Post by BogoGog24 on Jan 8, 2021 21:19:22 GMT
Yesterday I was like "the song is okay...I like it but I'm not sure how much I could listen it on repeat." Today I can say that I just can't stop listening to it. It really grew on me and It's been only 17 hoursΒ I agree, itβs stuck in my head!
|
|
BogoGog24
Administrator
I'm off again in my world...
Join Date: Mar 14, 2015 12:38:58 GMT
Posts: 15,225
Likes: 40,346
Last Online: Nov 17, 2024 3:53:03 GMT
|
Post by BogoGog24 on Jan 8, 2021 21:20:55 GMT
Itβs now #7 on iTunes alternative and #75 overall in the US
|
|
biggerwow
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 18, 2017 21:37:25 GMT
Posts: 6,220
Likes: 11,904
Last Online: Dec 5, 2018 5:20:38 GMT
|
Post by biggerwow on Jan 8, 2021 21:35:40 GMT
If any of you are wondering why the song is so short, it's a current music trend (particularly with up and coming artists). Shorter songs are more likely to be replayed, therefore Spotifys algorithms are more likely to include it on Playlists. If you look at Machine Gun Kellys new album most tracks are under 2mins and a Half. The same can be seen with lots of RnB artists such as those kids who sing Mood (which is HUGE in the UK and 2mins long!). Also, songs which fit in a chorus twice within a minute are very Tik Tokable... Which also effects streams! oh that's interesting! Of course Mod Sun and MGK would be doing this. It makes sense. But I hope Avril doesn't end up doing it too. I like modern music and I think she should stray from her tired formula but this is after all a trend. So I hope we don't get an album with super short songs. Hey btw why the hell are albums so long then? 16 tracks usually. They want sort songs to get attention but make super long albums.
|
|
BogoGog24
Administrator
I'm off again in my world...
Join Date: Mar 14, 2015 12:38:58 GMT
Posts: 15,225
Likes: 40,346
Last Online: Nov 17, 2024 3:53:03 GMT
|
Post by BogoGog24 on Jan 8, 2021 21:50:26 GMT
I just noticed that none of Modβs singles list the title or any text on their covers so I guess thatβs why Flames doesnβt have any text.
|
|
henryp92
Member
Join Date: Dec 7, 2018 10:28:10 GMT
Posts: 312
Likes: 666
Last Online: Jun 23, 2024 22:03:49 GMT
|
Post by henryp92 on Jan 8, 2021 22:22:52 GMT
I don't think is just the result of the filtering of the low frequencies... and if it is, the sound recovered was badly handled. I still don't see the-out-of-earth production others claim, specially coming from a site that bashes her previous 2 albums when they have very good produced songs. After resting it for a bit, I'm already tired of the song. I love the transitions, I like the ending the most, but it is just too repetitive. As a MS song, I think it lacks the bop factor Karma had. It doesn't feel enough like an Avril song to judge it, but if she stays this direction I hope she brings more to the table, including feelings and vocal performances. At least we have music now! And she is working! Kinda wonder who will she work with when they finish their sessions together... I hate saying this, but I'm an audio professional and studio owner... You guys have a misconception on how auto tune works and how songs are recorded, and it's ok, it's all pretty technical and even boring sometimes, and I'm here if you ever need tips or have any doubts or even if you need someone to mix a song, but like any professional, I ask for your understanding.Β When you record a vocal, you generally don't do just one take, because it has to be perfect.Β The producer will push you until you have recorded enough to have the perfect take, which will be made with parts of every take you've recorded (example: you take the first 20 seconds from take 1, 10 seconds from take 4, 15 seconds from take 3 and so it goes). I've seen singers record 2 takes for it to be perfect, and some others record 7 takes... the average is like 3 or 4. For a 3 minutes track, the vocal recording generally takes 1-3 hours with lead vocal takes and backing vocals depending on how many layers it will have. After that, in the mixing, you'll have little work to do with pitch and stuff, and you can do it on some notes manually using melodyne most of the times so you'll have more control over that, because auto tune will just do everything for you. Plus, when you use auto tune, the tune will be 0.0, which is the perfect tune, and most parts of "Flames" are on a -0.25 to a 0.25 gap, so it was corrected, but no auto tune was used, it was fixed manually by the engineers with melodyne with the gap presetted, and this gap means that this was a safe amount of fixing to do without changing so much because the singers weren't really off. They both must have recorded some takes. If the singer is really off or pitch perfect, you'll hear 0.0 tune on every note because no fixing was needed or because the audio engineers had to use auto tune.Β Auto tune is also not recommended in most cases, because it hides natural characteristics of voice, like timber, raspiness, etc. As for auto tune: it's either not listeneable or used stylistically or for market purposes (in order to make something more radio-friendly, like some of the songs on self-titled for example), or in case of Youtube covers and TV singing shows that are done overnight, because they don't have time to fix one by one manually. If a singer needs so much auto tune that you can hear it this easily for the pitch correcting purpose, they shouldn't even be a singer in the first place. As for Avril albums, I suppose Under My Skin and AL were the ones with more auto tune for different reasons. Under My Skin was kinda rushed by the label I guess, so I suppose she didn't have so much time to record the amount of takes needed for some tracks, and auto tune and melodyne were widely used in some tracks to correct the ones they couldn't make the perfect take (you can hear the corrections in the bridge and last chorus of Together, for example). On AL it was totally for market purposes, same reason why they used drumkit. HAW was the album with rawest vocals probably There are lots of ways to make something sound "robotic" in the studio without touching pitch correction. The high pass filter + subtle distortion used in her voice + short reverb is what's bothering. I like it, but I understand why it bothers... It was mixed as a rock track, a genre that is not as popular anymore, but these kinds of effects are always used that way. Each genre will have a way of mixing, it's like there are some "rules of mixing" for genres. In pop you may use more compression to make everything uniform and mix the vocals to the front of the sound, because it is treated as the main instrument, in rock the voice is louder than other instruments, but it is generally blended with instruments on the sides with distortion and small reverb (the filters seems to be Avril's thing), in folk you have more "full-quality" vocals so it sounds more raw, for that you use less compression and more equalizer. Some people relate more to some kinds of post-production (production= recording and arranging, post production = mixing and mastering). Other way of getting this "robotic sound" is apart from these effects, when you use doubled vocals, which is getting 2 different takes of vocals that sound almost the same playing in each side of your phones, it's made to make the voice sound bigger, "Innocence" was mixed like this on the choruses, for example. It's ok not to like the mixing of the song or the genre, I'm just hoping to help everyone understand more the tecnhiques used in the studio with this because I saw some of you guys had some doubts.Β I went way off topic here, I'm sorry First of all, thank very much for the elaborate answer and explanation. I'm myself very familiar with the proccess of recording and producing music, but as I am not a producer myself, I take your words as truly explanatory. I totally thought what happened to Avril's voice was due to pitch correction. I take down that statement. I'm still not comfortable with how it was handled though, and I am not talking about the distortion nor the reverb. Be it mixing of the takes, the way they filtered the voice or just the equipment it was recorded, it still feels like way more processed that it should be. But that's just personal taste. May I ask you what is your take on the, let's call it "climax" of the song? As someone pointed out before, many of the layers are very upfront. I know rock music is characterized with loud percussion lines and very prominent electric instruments for the arrangement, but they are usually held back to compliment the main melody rather than produce a strident sound of many things sounding at the same time. While I love the energy of that part, I feel like it almost cross the line to the "noise". I am sorry if I don't express myself properly, english is not my first language and it's been years since I left music to center on my career so I might be a little rusty on the terms . Edit: Haven't seen it in the thread, but on IG there is some behind the scenes of the recording of the song!
|
|
eismann
Member
Join Date: Mar 16, 2015 12:58:42 GMT
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 3,805
Last Online: Sept 15, 2019 19:47:36 GMT
|
Post by eismann on Jan 8, 2021 23:38:33 GMT
Hmmm... I have listened to it a couple of times and even though it's stuck in my head, I'm a bit underwhelmed. I don't like her first part, it needs more emotion. Then the song evolves really well (lyrics are nothing special but whatever), but then it's his 'robotic-voice'-part and then suddenly it's over. It doesn't fit. Especially with Avrils outro. Her voice is great but it doesn't fit.
So yeah, to me it's a nice song but nothing special really.
|
|
edd
Member
Join Date: Jul 15, 2015 5:52:19 GMT
Posts: 281
Likes: 442
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Last Online: Feb 23, 2022 0:52:40 GMT
|
Post by edd on Jan 9, 2021 0:17:28 GMT
I hate saying this, but I'm an audio professional and studio owner... You guys have a misconception on how auto tune works and how songs are recorded, and it's ok, it's all pretty technical and even boring sometimes, and I'm here if you ever need tips or have any doubts or even if you need someone to mix a song, but like any professional, I ask for your understanding. When you record a vocal, you generally don't do just one take, because it has to be perfect. The producer will push you until you have recorded enough to have the perfect take, which will be made with parts of every take you've recorded (example: you take the first 20 seconds from take 1, 10 seconds from take 4, 15 seconds from take 3 and so it goes). I've seen singers record 2 takes for it to be perfect, and some others record 7 takes... the average is like 3 or 4. For a 3 minutes track, the vocal recording generally takes 1-3 hours with lead vocal takes and backing vocals depending on how many layers it will have. After that, in the mixing, you'll have little work to do with pitch and stuff, and you can do it on some notes manually using melodyne most of the times so you'll have more control over that, because auto tune will just do everything for you. Plus, when you use auto tune, the tune will be 0.0, which is the perfect tune, and most parts of "Flames" are on a -0.25 to a 0.25 gap, so it was corrected, but no auto tune was used, it was fixed manually by the engineers with melodyne with the gap presetted, and this gap means that this was a safe amount of fixing to do without changing so much because the singers weren't really off. They both must have recorded some takes. If the singer is really off or pitch perfect, you'll hear 0.0 tune on every note because no fixing was needed or because the audio engineers had to use auto tune. Auto tune is also not recommended in most cases, because it hides natural characteristics of voice, like timber, raspiness, etc. As for auto tune: it's either not listeneable or used stylistically or for market purposes (in order to make something more radio-friendly, like some of the songs on self-titled for example), or in case of Youtube covers and TV singing shows that are done overnight, because they don't have time to fix one by one manually. If a singer needs so much auto tune that you can hear it this easily for the pitch correcting purpose, they shouldn't even be a singer in the first place. As for Avril albums, I suppose Under My Skin and AL were the ones with more auto tune for different reasons. Under My Skin was kinda rushed by the label I guess, so I suppose she didn't have so much time to record the amount of takes needed for some tracks, and auto tune and melodyne were widely used in some tracks to correct the ones they couldn't make the perfect take (you can hear the corrections in the bridge and last chorus of Together, for example). On AL it was totally for market purposes, same reason why they used drumkit. HAW was the album with rawest vocals probably There are lots of ways to make something sound "robotic" in the studio without touching pitch correction. The high pass filter + subtle distortion used in her voice + short reverb is what's bothering. I like it, but I understand why it bothers... It was mixed as a rock track, a genre that is not as popular anymore, but these kinds of effects are always used that way. Each genre will have a way of mixing, it's like there are some "rules of mixing" for genres. In pop you may use more compression to make everything uniform and mix the vocals to the front of the sound, because it is treated as the main instrument, in rock the voice is louder than other instruments, but it is generally blended with instruments on the sides with distortion and small reverb (the filters seems to be Avril's thing), in folk you have more "full-quality" vocals so it sounds more raw, for that you use less compression and more equalizer. Some people relate more to some kinds of post-production (production= recording and arranging, post production = mixing and mastering). Other way of getting this "robotic sound" is apart from these effects, when you use doubled vocals, which is getting 2 different takes of vocals that sound almost the same playing in each side of your phones, it's made to make the voice sound bigger, "Innocence" was mixed like this on the choruses, for example. It's ok not to like the mixing of the song or the genre, I'm just hoping to help everyone understand more the tecnhiques used in the studio with this because I saw some of you guys had some doubts. I went way off topic here, I'm sorry First of all, thank very much for the elaborate answer and explanation. I'm myself very familiar with the proccess of recording and producing music, but as I am not a producer myself, I take your words as truly explanatory. I totally thought what happened to Avril's voice was due to pitch correction. I take down that statement. I'm still not comfortable with how it was handled though, and I am not talking about the distortion nor the reverb. Be it mixing of the takes, the way they filtered the voice or just the equipment it was recorded, it still feels like way more processed that it should be. But that's just personal taste. May I ask you what is your take on the, let's call it "climax" of the song? As someone pointed out before, many of the layers are very upfront. I know rock music is characterized with loud percussion lines and very prominent electric instruments for the arrangement, but they are usually held back to compliment the main melody rather than produce a strident sound of many things sounding at the same time. While I love the energy of that part, I feel like it almost cross the line to the "noise". I am sorry if I don't express myself properly, english is not my first language and it's been years since I left music to center on my career so I might be a little rusty on the terms . Edit: Haven't seen it in the thread, but on IG there is some behind the scenes of the recording of the song! Thank you for not taking it as an arrogant comment, I was afraid that I'd put myself like being kinda show off I'm part of a rock band and I mix the songs with the guitarist as well, and the climax is pretty close to how I'd mix it. I would probably make Avril's voice show up a little more on the back, it seems to be on the same layer than Mod Sun sonically, I'd put it more in the back while louder than it is, but the instruments are REALLY well mixed, apart from the synth which I'd lower down a little bit (verty little). I'm a bass guitar h*e, so I'd probably make it more proeminent, but that's totally down to taste. They did a pretty good work at mixing this song, I may assume. Guide yourself for the distorted guitar when you listen to it (not the high-pitched rhythmic one), the rest will make more sense. English is not my first language as well, so no worries about that, I'd never judge you.
|
|
pllforlife
Member
Join Date: Aug 28, 2016 3:24:03 GMT
Posts: 2,447
Likes: 3,961
Last Online: Nov 13, 2024 15:05:18 GMT
|
Post by pllforlife on Jan 9, 2021 1:06:03 GMT
I know... donβt compare to Taylor but those two tracks she dropped today... ugh Av please write with Taylor or the same writers she has for the love of god. Donβt waste your time with ModSun.
|
|
TamyXD
Member
Think happy thoughts
Join Date: Apr 15, 2015 21:15:32 GMT
Posts: 2,307
Likes: 5,428
Location: Germany
Last Online: Nov 9, 2024 1:13:04 GMT
|
Post by TamyXD on Jan 9, 2021 1:31:25 GMT
I'm currently in this stage where it's 2:30 am and I keep telling myself "just one more play".
The song has grown so much on me already. It's just too good, especially the drums, ugh!
|
|
edd
Member
Join Date: Jul 15, 2015 5:52:19 GMT
Posts: 281
Likes: 442
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Last Online: Feb 23, 2022 0:52:40 GMT
|
Post by edd on Jan 9, 2021 1:37:54 GMT
Have you guys noticed that the song's lyrics are actually really smart? They're comparing the person they are or were attached to to some kind of drug, addiction... The person was abusive and manipulative but if they saw them again they would "relapse" because it's just too vicious and tempative. And the "burn for you" line is a metaphor to smoking or lighting up some other kind of drug.
It's repetitive but they really do send some message with this, whew
|
|
giveuwhatulike
Member
Join Date: Nov 18, 2020 20:23:31 GMT
Posts: 2,764
Likes: 7,288
Last Online: Nov 16, 2024 22:24:02 GMT
|
Post by giveuwhatulike on Jan 9, 2021 1:49:54 GMT
The way this grows and Grows and GROWS with each listen. It's been really a long time since i was this excited about Avril doing upbeat tracks. I'm not really a fan of her pop upbeat material from last decade. It lacked something. Her 10's were all about the ballads for me. Now i feel like i'm just ready to have (really) fun again!
|
|
TomX
Video Team
TBDT Video Editor
Join Date: Mar 20, 2015 0:57:41 GMT
Posts: 2,894
Likes: 9,063
Last Online: Nov 17, 2024 3:57:13 GMT
|
Post by TomX on Jan 9, 2021 1:50:48 GMT
Have you guys noticed that the song's lyrics are actually really smart? They're comparing the person they are or were attached to to some kind of drug, addiction... The person was abusive and manipulative but if they saw them again they would "relapse" because it's just too vicious and tempative. And the "burn for you" line is a metaphor to smoking or lighting up some other kind of drug. It's repetitive but they really do send some message with this, whew He actually made this statement about the lyrics: "This song holds a lot more weight than meets the eye. Thereβs a very deep message within it.β It's definitely deeper than what's on the surface.
|
|